In the first place I wish to tell you this: It is in hope that the following passage is meant for the benefit of creating trust, by convincing you that the ideas professed by me are strongly based on scientific and theory of photography. These criticism are not out of ill-feeling, but merely that I wish to start a campaign some happenings that are negative or a conducive approach to photography. Sine it is primarily as issue that would open argument and the counter I wish to dedicate a separate Blog site which is more suitable for discussion, but here the message is only partial. The site is

http://xanga.com/vaanan

I could only remember a celebrity photographer said to a daily, “I bought my dream camera, 39 mega-pixel Hasselblad Camera” and never did he fail to mention it did cost him 2 million Indian rupees, his PDA another ERs 50,000 and his fascination to own a Ferrari in future.

Is it an open Invitation for a burglary at his home, sort of a thing? Anyone keen to know about him? Sorry I know only his name not his home address. Or is it a new approach of publicity either by the photographer or the maker of the camera?

Although I could not able to buy a decent digital SLR camera for myself all these years, out of inquisitiveness [call it natural curiosity] I tried at Hakia.com with a search phrase “which is the most expensive camera” instead of usual Google. Seeing no promising search result in vicinity that has relevance to douse my quest, I again assisted the so called engine with another clue namely 'Medium format” hoping the winner would be an Hasselblad or a latest Sinar as an answer which I already knew. Equally I happened to come across some nonsensical sites. So here is a Best way, as a guide, you probably have to type key words such as “ nonsensical sites/photography” in such a search exercise, at Google, Yahoo, Hakia etc., and you are through. Although I may have no reason to write about others but there is specific reason to write about FLAAR report sites later in this page.

When the good old all-time warriors like Rolleiflex and Bronica are already out of the lane as contestants we could easily guess who would be raised to the podium as winners. Since a comparison with-in such a small sphere sounds meaningless, may I render my little guidance to suggest whether is it worth at all to make a decisional to opt for such a format as we did in the bygone era of film based photography. Ok an Hasselbld resemble the chubby cheeks of 'Preethi Zintha' in Bollywood. But with respect to comparison of performance and advantages between a Digital camera of smaller David against Goliath of a medium format, what else you priority should be to take into consideration than a your fascination for cheeks.....

In photography, which is a visual medium as well as with other kind of perceptions like hearing , taste, smell or in general our sensitivity to the external world is governed by law of Logarithmic progression .

Don't we know :

...a film speed of 200ASA is twice as faster than a film quoted to be 100ASA that is specified on the canister/box. Like wise 400ASA is twice that of the predecessor of 200ASA. [Could you please note this point that with film based photography, where we were at one point towards it's last chapter, we already have evolved to a stage that the difference in a photograph taken with a 100ASA and a 400ASA was very negligible].

...Like wise the shutter speed, the progression of aperture are to go with such progression, but it would be too insulting for you to hear if I touch upon these basics.